The evidence supporting the use of this treatment comes from a multicenter, randomised, phase III trial to receive either repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib (at a dose of 50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) or interferon alpha (IFN) (at a dose of 9 million international units subcutaneously three times weekly).
750 patients were enrolled with previously untreated, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma between August 2004 and October 2005 at 101 centres with 375 patients in each group. The patients were greater 18 years of age, ECOG of 0 to 1, had clear cell histology and had received no prior systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma, and were well balanced in respect to demographics and disease characteristics.r
The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes and safety.
In addition, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over patient preference study (PISCES) was performed to investigate the influence of tolerability on continuing treatment with pazopanib or sunitinib amongst patients with metastatic RCC. It was found that 70% of patients preferred pazopanib, 22% sunitinib and 8% had no preference (p<.001). Patients cited less fatigue and better quality of life as the main reasons for preferring pazopanib.r (link to ID 820 Pazopanib protocol)
Results of the COMPARZ study demonstrated similar efficacy between pazopanib and sunitinib in the first line setting. Median PFS was 8.4 months for patients treated with pazopanib compared with 9.5 months for those treated with sunitinib (HR 1.047). Overall response rates were 31% for pazopanib and 25% for sunitinib. Pazopanib was associated with less fatigue than sunitinib (55% vs 63%), less hand-foot syndrome (29% vs 50%), less taste alteration (26% vs 36%) and less thrombocytopenia (41% vs 78%). Pazopanib was associated with more alanine aminotransferase elevation than sunitinib (60% vs 43%). Health related quality of life scores were better in the pazopanib treated group than those in the sunitinib treated group.r
Efficacy
The primary endpoint of the study comparing sunitinib and interferon was progression free survival, which was statistically better for sunitinib patients. Median progression-free survival was 11 months in the sunitinib group (95% CI, 10 to 12) and 5 months in the IFN group (95% CI, 4 to 6), and a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.54; P<0.001).r
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival:r

© New England Journal of Medicine 2007
A final analysis in 2009 showed that the median overall survival was greater in the sunitinib group than in the IFN group (26.4 versus 21.8 months respectively; HR=0.821; p=0.051). Within the IFN group, 33% of patients received sunitinib, and 32% received other vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors after discontinuation. Objective response rate was 47% for sunitinib compared to 12% for IFN (p<0.001).r
Health related quality of life was significantly better in the sunitinib group than in the IFN group (P<0.001), as reported by patients in post baseline assessments with the use of both FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) and FKSI (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index) questionnaires.r
Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival:r
Median OS in the COMPARZ study was 28.3 months in the pazopanib group (95% CI, 26.0 to 35.5) and 29.1 months in the sunitinib group (95% CI, 25.4 to 33.1).
© N Engl J Med 2014
Toxicity
The median duration of treatment was 11 months in the sunitinib group and 4 months in the IFN group. Reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (60% sunitinib; 65% IFN). Most treatment-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the sunitinib group than in the IFN group. A dose reduction occurred in 50% of patients in the sunitinib group and 27% of patients in the IFN group.r
Hypothyroidism has been associated with sunitinib treatment and was reported as any grade and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events in 14% and 2% of patients, respectively. Decline in left ventricular ejection fraction is a recognized adverse event associated with sunitinib. 13% of patients had a sunitinib treatment-related adverse event of ejection fraction decline as reported by investigators, including 3% with grade 3 severity which is comparable with that previously reported suggesting that this is not a cumulative effect with long-term sunitinib treatment.r
Toxicityr |
Sunitinib
n=375 (%) |
Interferon Alfa
n=360 (%) |
All Grades |
Grade 3-4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3-4 |
Neutropenia |
72 |
11 |
46 |
7 |
Anaemia |
71 |
4 |
64 |
5 |
Diarrhoea |
53 |
5 |
12 |
0 |
Fatigue |
51 |
7 |
51 |
12 |
Nausea |
44 |
3 |
33 |
1 |
Stomatitis |
25 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Hypertension |
24 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
Hand and foot |
20 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
Rash |
19 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
Skin discolouration |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Epistaxis |
12 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Headache |
11 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
Increased creatinine |
65 |
8 |
21 |
0 |
© New England Journal of Medicine 2007